std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/27/14 5:03 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 08:23:48 UTC, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
>> On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 07:03:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't consider it a major issue as I don't think std.logger should
>>> be used inside Phobos at all.
>>
>> Yes, using std.logger inside of phobos is a no-no
>
> Ayway, let's come with an agreement/compromise with Martin and I'll
> start voting immediately after.

Agreed. Just to restate my position: so long as we don't have a way to 
statically control maximum logging level in the client, we don't have a 
logging library. There is no negotiation. -- Andrei