Encapsulating trust

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 11:30:43 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:08:25 +0000
> Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> 
> wrote:
>
> let me ask it again:
> how, in the name of hell, having handy sugar for the thing that 
> is
> *already* in the language can hurt us here?

In this particular case:

Because it _is_ handy. It shouldn't be. It's supposed to be ugly, 
to make you think twice whether you actually want to use it.

Besides, as was already mentioned, 'grep -r @trusted' wouldn't 
work anymore.