DIP31: compile time paradoxes defined. Requested examples added

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 09/25/2014 06:53 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP31
>
> I've been asked to add examples of resolution for various cases (hint
> they all error out).

"This DIP define their behavior properly, "

Not really. For one thing, at the moment, the DIP doesn't really make 
clear when and how a 'dependency' occurs.

"Mixin are resolved in order, which mean the first mixin is resolved first."

What do you mean? There is no order; there is no 'first' mixin.