operators in language reference
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 1 08:25:28 PDT 2015
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 13:36:38 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:40:24 +0000, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl
> wrote:
>
>> I find it lacking if I have to tell a newbie "look in the
>> documentation
>> for some other language for the definition of the operators
>> that you
>> can't find here somewhere"
>
> newbie should read some textbook first.
I think the language reference should be a comprehensive document
that doesn't technically require someone to know C(++) first to
understand. It doesn't necessarily have to be newbie friendly,
but it should be complete.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list