operators in language reference

John Colvin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 1 08:25:28 PDT 2015


On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 13:36:38 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:40:24 +0000, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl 
> wrote:
>
>> I find it lacking if I have to tell a newbie "look in the 
>> documentation
>> for some other language for the definition of the operators 
>> that you
>> can't find here somewhere"
>
> newbie should read some textbook first.

I think the language reference should be a comprehensive document 
that doesn't technically require someone to know C(++) first to 
understand. It doesn't necessarily have to be newbie friendly, 
but it should be complete.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list