Named unittests

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 06:21:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2015-04-01 21:16, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> This is fixed by having smaller modules. If test for a single 
>> module
>> takes more than few blinks of an eye, something is wrong 
>> already.
>
> For unit tests, yes. But there are other kinds of tests as 
> well. Integration, functional, user acceptance test and so on.

I don't think anyone is going to put those in a same inline style 
as unittest blocks, so this is not truly relevant. At least I 
hope so.