The next iteration of scope

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 4 13:12:06 PDT 2015


On 4/2/2015 4:44 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <schuetzm at gmx.net>" wrote:
> But I hope overloading is included under point 1. It's very important for
> efficiency.

I'm not convinced of the need for overloading on 'scope'.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list