Cleaned up C++

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 4/24/2015 10:27 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 08:16:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 4/24/2015 12:23 AM, John Colvin wrote:
>>> Except of course that alloca is a lot cheaper than malloc/free.
>>
>> That's not necessarily true. But in any case, go ahead and use it if you like.
>> Just prepare to benchmark and be disappointed :-)
>
> It is, unless one go the bump the pointer/never free road.

I wouldn't assume that. A large array on the stack will have memory caching issues.