Cleaned up C++

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 21:26:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 4/22/15 1:36 PM, John Colvin wrote:
>>
>> Is it even possible to contrive a case where
>> 1) The default initialisation stores are technically dead and
>> 2) Modern compilers can't tell they are dead and elide them and
>> 3) Doing the initialisation has a significant performance 
>> impact?
>>
>> The boring example is "extra code causes instruction cache 
>> misses".
>
> I've seen statically-sized arrays causing problems. -- Andrei

Care to outline an example?