DUB RC 0.9.24-rc.1 ready for testing

[Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d]

On 04/08/2015 16:52, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> BTW --bare is indeed welcome as I have to do some juggling to run
> several tests with code that integrates with DUB. But --bare is still
> very limited: you cant run `dub describe` on a directory of a DUB
> package. You have to run on the parent directory, which means you need
> to figure out the actual name of the DUB package (merely specifying the
> directory doesn't work). A bit of an annoyance.
> Why not simply have an option to specify the directory of the DUB local
> registry (the one with the local-packages.json file)? Such an option
> might have other uses as well, even beyond `dub describe`. This registry
> singleton shouldn't be hardcoded to just a default location.

Opened https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/issues/641

-- 
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros