dip25 implementation

[Xiaoxi via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 6 August 2015 at 21:16:20 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 8/6/15 4:24 PM, "Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?= 
> <per.nordlow at gmail.com>" wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 4 August 2015 at 20:54:43 UTC, Steven 
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> How complete is the dip25 implementation?
>>>
>>> For example, should this be expected to be an error?
>>>
>>> struct S
>>> {
>>>   int[5] x;
>>>   auto foo() { return x[];}
>>> }
>>
>> You need to (at least) qualify `foo` as @safe.
>
> According to 2.067.0 it was an error without annotating as 
> @safe if you use -dip25. I don't understand the "relaxing" of 
> it in the latest version, but maybe I'm missing something.
>

auto functions now trigger inferance