dmd codegen improvements

rsw0x via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Aug 18 14:18:32 PDT 2015


On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 10:45:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> Martin ran some benchmarks recently that showed that ddmd 
> compiled with dmd was about 30% slower than when compiled with 
> gdc/ldc. This seems to be fairly typical.
>
> I'm interested in ways to reduce that gap.

retire dmd?
this is ridiculous.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list