dmd codegen improvements

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

> >On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 10:45:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>Martin ran some benchmarks recently that showed that ddmd compiled
> >>with dmd was about 30% slower than when compiled with gdc/ldc. This
> >>seems to be fairly typical.
[...]

This matches my experience of dmd vs. gdc as well. No surprise there.


> >>I'm interested in ways to reduce that gap.
[...]

Replace the backend with GDC or LLVM? :-P


T

-- 
Prosperity breeds contempt, and poverty breeds consent. -- Suck.com