2.068.0 regression?

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 at 21:56:22 UTC, sigod wrote:
> ```
> T to(string units, T, D)(D td)
> ```
>
> But what compiler does with this function? How `void` appears 
> in the error message?

There are no arguments used thus `to` is resolved as plain 
template symbol, not a function. Template that does not resolve 
to any valid entity is treated as if it had type 'void' in error 
messages, even if it is not technically true.

> Why does it even picks this function? `to` has required 
> argument, apparently it can't be called without one.

When you shadow some symbol with a new declaration in more 
"local" scope, it gets shadow completely, not just added to 
overload set. No matter what arguments are used only the new 
symbol will get used.