dmd codegen improvements

rsw0x via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at
Thu Aug 20 19:02:55 PDT 2015

On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 01:20:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 00:00:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> The gdc version, by contrast, inlines *everything*,
> This could be why I've observed performance differentials in 
> dmd for doing some manual for loops rather than using the stuff 
> in std.algorithms.

ldc and gdc typically produce output nearly the same as 
handwritten loops for ranges.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list