dmd codegen improvements
rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Aug 20 19:02:55 PDT 2015
On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 01:20:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 00:00:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> The gdc version, by contrast, inlines *everything*,
> This could be why I've observed performance differentials in
> dmd for doing some manual for loops rather than using the stuff
> in std.algorithms.
ldc and gdc typically produce output nearly the same as
handwritten loops for ranges.
More information about the Digitalmars-d