dmd codegen improvements

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 20:47:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 20:41:58 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 10:11:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
>> wrote:
>>>>> Replicating a scalar SSA like LLVM does not make a lot of 
>>>>> sense. What would make a lot of sense would be to start work
>>>
>>>> WAT ?
>>>
>>> When simplifying over scalars you make a trade off. By having 
>>> a simplifier that is optimized for keeping everything in 
>>> vector units you can get better results for some code 
>>> sections.
>>>
>>
>> That still do not make any sense.
>>
>>>>> Or a high level compile-time oriented IR for D that can 
>>>>> boost templates semantics and compilation speed.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's impossible in the state of template right now (I know 
>>>> I've been there and dropped it as the return on investement 
>>>> was too low).
>>>
>>> What is it about D template mechanics that make JITing 
>>> difficult?
>>
>> "Or a high level compile-time oriented IR for D that can boost 
>> templates semantics and compilation speed."
>>
>> "What is it about D template mechanics that make JITing 
>> difficult?"
>>
>> You are not even trying to make any sense, do you ?
>
> What is the source of your reading comprehension problems?
>
> You are deliberately trolling. I know.

The answer is blue. KAMOULOX !