std.data.json formal review

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Aug 25 08:02:42 PDT 2015


On 08/25/2015 08:18 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 08/18/2015 12:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> * All new stuff should go in std.experimental. I assume "stdx" would
>> change to that, should this work be merged.
>
> Though stdx (or better std.x) would have been a prettier and more
> exciting name for std.experimental to begin with.
>

The great thing about the experimental package is that we are actually 
allowed to rename it. :-)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list