std.data.json formal review

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/25/15 11:02 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 08:18 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> On 08/18/2015 12:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> * All new stuff should go in std.experimental. I assume "stdx" would
>>> change to that, should this work be merged.
>>
>> Though stdx (or better std.x) would have been a prettier and more
>> exciting name for std.experimental to begin with.
>>
>
> The great thing about the experimental package is that we are actually
> allowed to rename it. :-)

I strongly oppose renaming it. I don't want Phobos to fall into the trap 
of javax, which was supposed to be "experimental" but then became unmovable.

std.experimental is much more obvious that you shouldn't expect things 
to live there forever.

-Steve