dmd codegen improvements

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"John Colvin"  wrote in message news:qlbnpjnizwpslrdpktsw at forum.dlang.org...

> I think he's saying that the argument: "Don't work on DMD because it's 
> already far behind" could have been applied to working on LLVM when it was 
> far behind GCC.  I don't agree, but I think that's what he means.

It helps that LLVM has a superior license.