dmd codegen improvements

Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Aug 29 11:07:44 PDT 2015


On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 13:06:58 UTC, David Nadlinger 
wrote:
> But the fact is that many people are not. Even the core 
> language team, who doesn't want their compiler to get 30% 
> slower on the next release.

That's why your work on ldc and Iain's on gdc matters!

I don't object to work on dmd's optimizations, but I'm ok with 
them staying the way they are too since ldc and gdc are fairly 
easy to use now.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list