Forum structure

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 at 14:45:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 12/1/15 5:31 AM, Luis wrote:
>> Being DUB very important for D language... why there isn't an 
>> entry for
>> DUB on ecosystem ?
>>
>> Also, looks that DWT isn't very active. Not should be a "GUI" 
>> entry to
>> talk about GtkD, TkD and other GUI toolkits, instead focusing 
>> on one
>> that looks that no body uses ?
>>
>> PD: I don't know the true state of DWT, but GtkD and TkD 
>> simply just works.
>
> I would discourage adding any more groups. I don't really get 
> the point of having so many groups, if you have a question, use 
> the main group or the learn group. That is where all of us are 
> paying attention.
>
> I (and I presume many other D veterans) wouldn't see any 
> discussions on other groups. The fact that other groups have 
> little discussion is likely evidence that having other groups 
> isn't helping questioners reach answers.
>
> I frequently go to a site with many categories for groups, and 
> don't know where to post my question. I hate that.
>
> -Steve

While I agree in general, the problem is that DUB has a dedicated 
forum "far away" from this forum. Sometimes, when people have a 
question, they don't know where to post it. Here or on the 
dedicated D forum run by Sönke. Now that DUB has become part of 
"official D", wouldn't it make sense to tie it in a bit better? 
Also, DUB questions are more frequent than GDC or LDC questions 
(not to mention DWT).