Thoughts on a Future Garbage Collector

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 3 December 2015 at 19:03:35 UTC, Nerve wrote:
> changes, and no insights into how to improve such a system. But 
> I do see why they went that route. Type safety is a top concern.

Did you mean memory safety? Neither C++ or D offer much help if 
you want strong nominal typing. Which is a pity, because it makes 
my typesafe code look like a mess.