Complexity nomenclature

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Dec 4 06:06:54 PST 2015


On 12/04/2015 04:27 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> And who knows, maybe someone will discover a more efficient way to
> implement "insertAfter" or the collection itself... We should change its
> name?

Of course. The old name will still work because, remember, there's a 
hierarchy of operations; those that promise less automatically forward 
to those that promise more. -- Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list