Complexity nomenclature

[ref2401 via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 4 December 2015 at 16:06:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> Well look at what the cat dragged in:
>
> http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/711aecacc450
>
> That's quite promising. The code is very preliminary and uses 
> strings for typical complexity values (e.g. "constant", 
> "linear", and later "loglinear" etc). I need to see how to 
> integrate this whole idea.
>
> Also an unpleasant problem is overloading - when present, user 
> code needs to specify which overload they're referring to.
>
> Anyhow, this is really interesting. Thanks Tofu.
>
>
> Andrei

Wow! It looks really great.