Safe reference counting cannot be implemented as a library

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 5 December 2015 at 22:06:33 UTC, sclytrack wrote:
> On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 09:56:14 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 22:04:51 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 20:55:00 UTC, Martin Nowak 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 11/01/2015 09:51 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>
>
> http://lists.puremagic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dlang-study
>
>
> The last post on the study group ended a while ago. Does that 
> mean it is not going forward. It suggest to talk about 
> lifetime. Is that with or without talking about
> reference counting simultaneously?
>

It means that now that all the bikescheding is behind, people can 
work on the hard problems. And it takes time. Especially when you 
have goto int he language.