Nullable condition operator

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 08:30:21 UTC, Martin6265 wrote:
> But the syntax of it will be like calling template func, and 
> its not desirable.
> The trick is in the simplicity of the pattern not only in 
> functionality.

I guess it's somewhat subjective, as while I liked the ?. syntax 
at first I now find it very noisy. 
You?.have?()?.a?.million?.question?.marks?()?.cluttering?.your?.code

I find the D syntax much cleaner, because it's just regular 
function call syntax.

maybe(You).have().exactly.zero.question.marks().cluttering.your.code