Better string representation for TypeSeq used as function arg type?

Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Dec 12 06:09:05 PST 2015


cym13 wrote:

> So, no, it's not a Voldemort type, it's exactly what the compiler
> tells you it is: the sequence of types (int, double).

Hmmm it seems to me that if it's not a runtime-valid type, then typeof() 
shouldn't work at all...

-- 
Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list