Voting For std.experimental.ndslice

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

Yes with many conditions:

* Documentation
** The documentation needs a complete rewrite. If I hadn't had 
any prior knowledge, I would have needed to read the numpy 
documentation to figure what this package does. That is not 
acceptable. It is also not clear how the functionally in the 
package is supposed to work together, and how it interacts with 
the rest of phobos.
** Params, Returns ...

* Style
** the source code does not look like phobos
** s/assert (/assert(/g
** s/unittest {/unittest\n{/g
** unittest properties should be on the same line as the unittest 
keyword
** spaces between operators
** dfmt and some manuel work is your friend

* Testing
** most tests only use itoa, what about arrays what about arrays 
with user defined types. That's properly trivial but should be 
tested.
** interaction with rest of phobos. Can I call map on a Slice? If 
I can, it should be tested so that it still works after the next 
release.

* Miscellaneous
** string mixins. I think some of the string mixins can be 
removed for something more readable/debuggable
**