vibe.d benchmarks

[Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d]

V Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:32:08 +0000
yawniek via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> napsáno:

> >>> Sönke is already on it.
> >>>
> >>> http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/post/29110  
> 
> i guess its not enough, there are still things that make vibe.d 
> slow.
> 
> i quickly tried
> https://github.com/nanoant/WebFrameworkBenchmark.git
> which is really a very simple benchmark but it shows about the 
> general overhead.
> 
> single core results against go-fasthttp with GOMAXPROCS=1 and 
> vibe distribution disabled on a c4.2xlarge ec2 instance 
> (archlinux):
> 
> vibe.d 0.7.23 with ldc
> Requests/sec:  52102.06
> 
> vibe.d 0.7.26 with dmd
> Requests/sec:  44438.47
> 
> vibe.d 0.7.26 with ldc
> Requests/sec:  53996.62
> 
> go-fasthttp:
> Requests/sec: 152573.32
> 
> go:
> Requests/sec:  62310.04
> 
> its sad.
> 
> i am aware that go-fasthttp is a very simplistic, stripped down 
> webserver and vibe is almost a full blown framework. still it 
> should be D and vibe.d's USP to be faster than the fastest in the 
> world and not limping around at the end of the charts.
> 
> 

Which async library you use for vibed? libevent? libev? or libasync?
Which compilation switches you used?

Without this info it says nothing about vibe.d's performance :)