Should we remove int[$] before 2.067?

[uri via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 09:46:45 UTC, eles wrote:
>
>> Whatever, anyway.
>
> Translation of that being:
>
> "Boring pedestrian issues like simple string logging are 
> bikeshedded for YEARS, yet PhD-level esoteric stuff makes it 
> into phobos with relative ease."
>
> https://github.com/klamonte/cycle/blob/master/docs/no_more_d.md
>
> cautios and determination, isn't? or, revolutionary and 
> conservative, how I did put it...

+1

At least decisions are finally being made on several fronts 
recently though.

W.r.t this feature, I was personally looking forward to it ... 
guess I'll stick with the Octave/R/Python "troika" for rapid 
protoyping numerical analysis code.