Zero-length static array spec

H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Feb 1 07:46:50 PST 2015


On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 03:11:07PM +0000, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
> Infinitely small:
> Smaller than the smallest thing ever and then some more. Much smaller
> than that in fact, really amazingly insignificant, a totally
> unimpressive size, real 'wow, that's small', time.  Infinitely small
> is just so small that by comparison, smallness itself looks really
> humongous.  Miniscule divided by meager divided by staggeringly
> infinitesimal is the sort of concept we're trying to get across here.
[...]

Wait wait wait... Miniscule *divided* by meager divided by staggeringly
infinitesimal?! Wouldn't that be a non-standard number larger than any
finite number?


T

-- 
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences.  You have biases.  He/She has prejudices. -- Gene Wirchenko


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list