Should we remove int[$] before 2.067?

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 1 February 2015 at 09:20:11 UTC, eles wrote:
> but the grounds that I was criticizing were not this ones. were 
> the grounds of "it ma be done otherwise, just look at this nice 
> bed-of-nails syntax"!

Yeah, I agree that the library solution for what should be 
builtin makes no sense.

In language design it is often a good idea to prototype potential 
language features as a library solution first, but not in the 
standard library...