H1 2015 Priorities and Bare-Metal Programming

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d"  wrote in message 
news:mailman.5711.1422808332.9932.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...

> Only if optimisation passes removes the promise the compiler gives to
> the user.  I'll have to check whether or not the proposed
> implementation in gdc is even viable vs. having a 'C volatile' type.

How could it not be?  It's just *(volatile T*)ptr = value; - which gcc ir 
can obviously express.