H1 2015 Priorities and Bare-Metal Programming

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/1/2015 8:32 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Only if optimisation passes removes the promise the compiler gives to
> the user.  I'll have to check whether or not the proposed
> implementation in gdc is even viable vs. having a 'C volatile' type.

dmd actually translates those intrinsics into "volatile" C accesses. I presume 
gdc and ldc could do the same.