DIP56 - inlining

Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 3 15:25:24 PST 2015


On Tuesday, 3 February 2015 at 23:23:35 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> We have an attribute system, why make this a pragma ?

Rationale is in the DIP: "These are not attributes because they 
should not affect the semantics of the function. In particular, 
the function signature must not be affected."


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list