Another idiom I wish were gone from phobos/druntime

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 04:36:39 UTC, Zach the Mystic 
wrote:
> I have an idea. Treat all assert statements which come before 
> the first non-assert statement as part of the 'in' contract. 
> I'm not saying the compiler has to generate a whole 'in' 
> function, but these asserts can be internally tagged to behave 
> *as if* in an 'in' contract. That solves the tooling problem 
> and the too-much-code problem, no?

No. There is no point of screwing up the language because an 
arbitrary choice of formating is taking an absurd amount of 
vertical space.