Another idiom I wish were gone from phobos/druntime

[Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 08:22:24 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> No. It's just a frustratingly common mistake - like saying "for 
> all
> intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes."
> Unfortunately, many folks couldn't care less about getting it 
> right...

Well, when you grow up hearing it, you reach for the notion and 
the words just come out before you can apply the filter. 
Irregardless, same difference.