Another idiom I wish were gone from phobos/druntime

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 09:43:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> There is no such difference in the current implementation. 
> assertions inside
> of in and out blocks are no different from assertions inside of 
> the
> functions themselves with regards to when they are compiled in 
> or not.

Good point. One problem is that base asserts throw exceptions on 
loosening contract on overriding method. Asserts in contracts can 
behave differently, e.g. derived contract can call base contract 
with a parameter asking to not throw on failure.