A safer interface for core.stdc

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Feb 7 20:14:39 PST 2015


On 2/7/15 7:52 PM, tcak wrote:
> One of the reasons why I use C functions is that I expect same behaviour
> from D code what I would expect from C. I don't think it is a good idea
> to make wrapper on top of them. Maybe you could say, "Hey, look, it just
> makes safer, that's all", but, hmm there are so many functions, and this
> wrapping process can go in many directions.

Just looking at making them safe. Not all can be made safe btw. -- Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list