Const-correctness and uniqueness. Again.

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 18:37:42 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 13:54:12 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Monday, 9 February 2015 at 23:40:31 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> Someone is starting to see where I'm getting at when I'm 
>>> pushing for owned...
>>
>> I don't think this specific case is a good justification for 
>> your proposal - it is simple enough to accept a library based 
>> solution. We need more accumulated anecdotal evidence.
>
> We do have. That is simply one more. On the top of my head:
>  - Plug hole in the type system (implicit sharing).
>  - Use the guarantee the type system is supposed to provide to 
> get a better GC.
>  - Construction of immutable objects.
>  - make @nogc actually useful for something else than trivias 
> (throw, defers usage of GC to the caller).
>  - make std.concurency and std.parallelism safe end to end.
>  - Be able to lock tree of objects.
>  - Generating less garbage overall.
>  - ...

Or we can add an easier hack for each of these. That is gonna 
scale well.