H1 2015 - C++ integration

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Guillaume Chatelet"  wrote in message 
news:gvnxmwplwkyfrydwrulq at forum.dlang.org...

> I'm not sure I get your point. In C++ classes without vtables are exactly 
> like structs. Also I don't see any difference between a struct or a class 
> name mangling on Gnu Linux.
>
> class/struct S{};
> S foo();
>
> foo gets mangled "_Z3foov" if S is a struct or a class.
>
> What did I miss ? Do you have compelling examples ?

This is not a good example, because the return type is clearly not mangled 
into the function name.  (Because you can't overload on return type.)

void foo(S); should show the problem with some mangling schemes.