C++ function signature template parameter mangling issue

Benjamin Thaut via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Feb 17 04:07:02 PST 2015


On Tuesday, 17 February 2015 at 08:16:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> True, it might be easier to adjust the C++ side so it takes a 
> pointer to a function type.

In this case it would be really ugly

ezDelegate<void()> vs ezDelegate<void(*)()>

I will do a pull request later today fixing this mangling issue.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list