Stackless resumable functions
bitwise via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Feb 20 09:51:15 PST 2015
Just out of curiosity, is anyone planning to implement this?
As for why it's not already implemented, is it because of lack of
interest, or prohibitive reasons?
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 10:33:40 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> This is so much better than Fibers.
> http://youtu.be/KUhSjfSbINE
>
> What I like most about the proposal is that you can adapt await
> by specializing template functions, similar to how range based
> foreach works.
> It also isn't tied to a particular scheduling mechanism and of
> course consumes much less memory than stack based suspension.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list