Memory safety depends entirely on GC ?

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 02:35:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> For each of these issues, solution are proposed. What I (and I 
> think Mark would agree) propose would solve them all. Yes this 
> is more complex than any of the solution proposed for each of 
> these. But this is way simpler, and enable way more than having 
> a unique, simpler solution for each of these problems.

Indeed I agree.

But judging by Andrei's response above, I'm longer so sure he is 
actually aware of what we proposed.