Memory safety depends entirely on GC ?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 18:01:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 2/24/15 9:47 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= 
> <schuetzm at gmx.net>" wrote:
>> Out of interest, because that will be crucial for the further
>> development: are you completely opposed to any kind of 
>> ownership system,
>> or is it something specific about this particular proposal 
>> that you
>> don't like?
>
> There's no opposition on matters of principle/dogma. It's just 
> too complicated for what it provides.
>
> Andrei

Compared to what ?