Contradictory justification for status quo

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 11:10:16 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi 
wrote:
> I think the real problem goes clearly beyond enums, it's an 
> overall approach to changes in the D language itself.
>
> I join to deadalnix's worries.
>
> ---
> Paolo

Yes, I don't care about the specific enum case, in fact, that is 
one of the least offender and this is why I choose it as an 
example here.

What worries me is that whatever way you take the problem there 
is a good reason not to proceed. And, taken independently, every 
one of these reason are valid, or at least something reasonable 
people can agree upon.

But there is no way we can agree on all of these at once.