DIP74: Reference Counted Class Objects

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 03:49:04 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:13:31 +0000, weaselcat wrote:
>
>> Are op* considered reserved member names?
>
> no. that's just the "we can break your code, and you can't 
> break ours!"
> it's funny how the argument "we will not break user's code" 
> pops up even
> for breaking invalid code, but completely ignored for perfectly 
> valid
> code not forbidden by the specs.

I think this is justified to break the code here, but I share the 
irritation in front of the inconsistency.