Is there such a thing?
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Feb 28 09:24:56 PST 2015
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 19:49:37 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
> On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 07:26:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
> wrote:
>> On 2015-02-26 20:53, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
>>> So, In languages like .net they have dll's that contain not
>>> only
>>> bytecode but also the necessary headers to make them usable
>>> in any .net
>>> language. I was curious if this kind of thing has ever been
>>> attempted
>>> for static libraries?
>>>
>>> basically some type of universal header + static library =
>>> Everything
>>> Needed to use in project file.
>>>
>>> of course they would be targeted for a certain platform but
>>> would be
>>> really easy to grab/use.
>>>
>>> And if the header could be agreed upon any compiled language
>>> could use
>>> the library which would be a huge benefit.
>>>
>>> Perhaps i'm incorrect in my assumptions. Let me know what you
>>> think
>>> about the idea?
>>
>> I think it's better to use a package manager to handle this.
>> It will also automatically download the necessary files. Also
>> it will help (hopefully) you to find the libraries you need.
>
> I just think its a shame that all over the place people are
> compiling code in different programming languages, and although
> all the .o files are compatible with each other there isn't a
> standard cross language way of defining a binding. But that
> would be making people agree on things...
On Windows that standard it is called COM for OO languages,
stdcall/pascal for procedural ones and BCL for those targeting
.NET.
--
Paulo
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list