Improving ddoc

Manu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jan 1 14:45:36 PST 2015


On 2 January 2015 at 03:06, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 01/01/15 17:16, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> Doxygen supports both @param and \param.
>
>
> Ah yes, I'd forgotten that.  It's been a while :-\
>
>> It would be really good if doxygen supported D comprehensively. I
>> often port C code to D which already has doxygen commentary. I never
>> port the doxygen docs to ddoc though.
>
>
> Did you ever try preserving the docs and continuing to use doxygen to
> generate them?  If so, how did it go?  Or is that an outright impossibility?

Doxygen doesn't know about most D-specific concepts stuff. Other
language concepts are usually a subset of C/C++, but C++ is really a
subset of D. Doxygen needs some new concepts as far as I can tell.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list