D and Nim

[CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 08:13:29 UTC, Jonathan wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the incite so far! Reading between the 
> lines, I gather most thoughts are that both languages are 
> similar in their positioning/objectives yet differ in certain 
> domains (e.g. generic/template capabilities) and qualities 
> (e.g. Nim opinionated choice of scope delimiters). Does that 
> sound logical? This was kind of the thing I was fishing for 
> when thinking of the post.

First sentence ... did you mean 'insight' or was that some sort
of Freudian slip :o)