Ready to make page-per-item ddocs the default?

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 1/6/15 8:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked from
>>> here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Is it intentional for all of the stdc pages to be empty?
>
> It's a somewhat unfortunate fallout of the level of granularity. I think
> each of these headers should include a standard text and a link to some
> good documentation in C-land. -- Andrei

I like this idea.

One thing that may be misleading about this -- our headers don't include 
*everything* from C-land.

What would be a good generic blurb? strawman:

core.stdc.ctype:
"This contains bindings to selected types and functions from the 
standard C header <ctype.h> (see 
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/ctype.h.html). 
Note that this is not automatically generated, and may omit some 
types/functions from the original C header."

I'm thinking we should actually just put a /// before every symbol, to 
get it in the ddoc so you can see what *is* included.

Thoughts? I can put together a pull for core.stdc.* if it makes sense.

-Steve